New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
Locked
 
|
I would like to submit a new egg for publication:
SRFI-87: => in case clauses Its documentation is here: [1] Its release-info is here: [2] test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. --Sergey [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-87 [2] - https://github.com/diamond-lizard/srfi-87/raw/main/release-info |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
|
|
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:36:56 -0800 [hidden email] wrote:
> I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-87: => in case clauses > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-87 > > [2] - https://github.com/diamond-lizard/srfi-87/raw/main/release-info Thanks. I'm afraid SRFI-87 is already supported by CHICKEN core, isn't it? Am I missing something? All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario |
|
|
On Sat 21 Nov 2020 12:14:29 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > > Thanks. I'm afraid SRFI-87 is already supported by CHICKEN core, isn't > it? Am I missing something? Hmm... it wasn't listed on the Supported Standards page[1] megane in #chicken alsays said: "yep, there's => support for case in core already" If I knew this SRFI was already supported, I wouldn't have bothered packaging it. Oh well, it was a quick and easy one.. so no big deal.. I guess you can just ignore my egg. However, is there somewhere on the wiki I could link to where it mentions that SRFI-87 support is in core? --Sergey [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/supported-standards |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
|
|
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
|
|
In reply to this post by noosphere
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:18:54 -0800 <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Sat 21 Nov 2020 12:14:29 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> >> Thanks. I'm afraid SRFI-87 is already supported by CHICKEN core, isn't >> it? Am I missing something? > > Hmm... it wasn't listed on the Supported Standards page[1] > > megane in #chicken alsays said: > > "yep, there's => support for case in core already" > > If I knew this SRFI was already supported, I wouldn't have bothered > packaging it. > > Oh well, it was a quick and easy one.. so no big deal.. I guess you can > just ignore my egg. > > However, is there somewhere on the wiki I could link to where it > mentions that SRFI-87 support is in core? > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/supported-standards The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0] to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can tell. It is documented in http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types (look for the documentation of `case') All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario |
|
|
On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0] > to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can > tell. It is documented in > http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types > (look for the documentation of `case') I have some questions about this. First, when packaging up the SRFI-87 egg, I ported over the SRFI-87 documentation over to svnwiki syntax and posted it on the Chicken wiki: http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-87 Because of that, it's now possible to find SRFI-87 and related search terms in a search of the Chicken wiki. Should we keep this documentation? If we do, of course I can take myself out of the credits for packaging up SRFI-87 as there'll be no SRFI-87 egg, and take out the Version history section, and I could put in a note that SRFI-87 is supported in Chicken core with a link to the page you linked to above. Finally, if we do keep it I can link to that page from our Supported Standards and Chicken SRFI Support pages. If we don't keep it, then I could just link directly to: https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types The other questions I have regard my investigation of SRFI-87 support in Chicken. When you mentioned that Chicken had SRFI-87 support, I tried importing SRFI-87 in csi and succeded, tried uninstalling it (which also succeeded), and the tried installing it again (which failed). If SRFI-87 is not an egg and if there's no explicit support of SRFI-87 in chicken, how was I able to (import srfi-87) and uninstall it, and why couldn't I reinstall it? Here's a log of what I did: % csi CHICKEN (c) 2008-2020, The CHICKEN Team (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann Version 5.2.0 (rev 317468e4) linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit dload ptables ] Type ,? for help. #;1> (import srfi-87) ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/srfi-87.import.so ... ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/chicken.platform.import.so ... Note: re-importing already imported syntax: case ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/srfi-87.so ... #;2> % chicken-uninstall srfi-87 About to delete the following extensions: srfi-87 Do you want to proceed? (yes/no) yes removing srfi-87 % chicken-install srfi-87 Server error: Error: [Server] no such extension or version "srfi-87" #f Server error: Error: [Server] no such extension or version "srfi-87" #f Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-87" % csi CHICKEN (c) 2008-2020, The CHICKEN Team (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann Version 5.2.0 (rev 317468e4) linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit dload ptables ] Type ,? for help. #;1> (import srfi-87) Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from undefined module: srfi-87 Call history: <syntax> (import srfi-87) <-- #;1> |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
|
|
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0] >> to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can >> tell. It is documented in >> http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types >> (look for the documentation of `case') > > I have some questions about this. > > First, when packaging up the SRFI-87 egg, I ported over the SRFI-87 > documentation over to svnwiki syntax and posted it on the Chicken wiki: > > http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-87 > > Because of that, it's now possible to find SRFI-87 and related search > terms in a search of the Chicken wiki. > > Should we keep this documentation? I think it should be removed. The support for `=>' in `case' clauses is already documented in the manual. Having a /eggref/5/srfi-87 page is going to be misleading, as it would indicate that a srfi-87 egg exists. > If we do, of course I can take myself out of the credits for packaging > up SRFI-87 as there'll be no SRFI-87 egg, and take out the Version > history section, and I could put in a note that SRFI-87 is supported in > Chicken core with a link to the page you linked to above. Finally, if > we do keep it I can link to that page from our Supported Standards and > Chicken SRFI Support pages. If we don't keep it, then I could just link > directly to: > > https://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types > > The other questions I have regard my investigation of SRFI-87 support in > Chicken. When you mentioned that Chicken had SRFI-87 support, I tried > importing SRFI-87 in csi and succeded, tried uninstalling it (which also > succeeded), and the tried installing it again (which failed). > > If SRFI-87 is not an egg and if there's no explicit support of SRFI-87 > in chicken, how was I able to (import srfi-87) and uninstall it, and why > couldn't I reinstall it? You could import it because you had a srfi-87 module installed on your system (probably your own egg). Regarding not being able to install it, did you call chicken-install from the directory with the sources of your egg? If you didn't, that's expected to fail, as the egg has not been added to our egg servers. > Here's a log of what I did: > > % csi > CHICKEN > (c) 2008-2020, The CHICKEN Team > (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann > Version 5.2.0 (rev 317468e4) > linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit dload ptables ] > > Type ,? for help. > #;1> (import srfi-87) > ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/srfi-87.import.so ... > ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/chicken.platform.import.so ... > > Note: re-importing already imported syntax: case > ; loading /home/me/apps/chicken/overlayfs/merged-chicken/lib/chicken/11/srfi-87.so ... > #;2> > % chicken-uninstall srfi-87 > About to delete the following extensions: > > srfi-87 > > Do you want to proceed? (yes/no) yes > removing srfi-87 > % chicken-install srfi-87 > Server error: > > Error: [Server] no such extension or version > "srfi-87" > #f > Server error: > > Error: [Server] no such extension or version > "srfi-87" > #f > > Error: extension or version not found: "srfi-87" > % csi > CHICKEN > (c) 2008-2020, The CHICKEN Team > (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann > Version 5.2.0 (rev 317468e4) > linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit dload ptables ] > > Type ,? for help. > #;1> (import srfi-87) > > Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from undefined module: srfi-87 > > Call history: > > <syntax> (import srfi-87) <-- > #;1> > All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
|
|
Since the content of SRFI-87 is built in to the current Chicken, #:srfi-87 should be added to the output of `features` in (chicken-platform). On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 3:16 AM Mario Domenech Goulart <[hidden email]> wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 <[hidden email]> wrote: |
|
|
In reply to this post by Mario Domenech Goulart-4
On Sun 22 Nov 2020 09:15:46 AM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Should we keep this documentation? > > I think it should be removed. Done. >> If SRFI-87 is not an egg and if there's no explicit support of SRFI-87 >> in chicken, how was I able to (import srfi-87) and uninstall it, and why >> couldn't I reinstall it? > > You could import it because you had a srfi-87 module installed on your > system (probably your own egg). > > Regarding not being able to install it, did you call chicken-install > from the directory with the sources of your egg? If you didn't, that's > expected to fail, as the egg has not been added to our egg servers. That's why I was surprised it was installed to begin with, since I'm pretty sure I didn't install it from within my egg directory, but I guess I must have if it's not part of Chicken and there's no such egg on the servers. --Sergey |
«
Return to chicken-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |