Hi,
so good news first, I have uploaded the full linphone stack (4.4.x) and linphone-desktop 4.2.5 to Debian unstable yesterday. If everything goes well it will be included in the next stable release. Testing it I have observed an issue with the H264 codec and I don't know where to start. First of all, if I'm not mistaken we basically have three options to get H264 encoding/decoding. - msx264 - would be the preferable solution since x264 is already in Debian, but appears to be dormant at https://gitlab.linphone.org/BC/public/msx264 and does not build with GCC-10 - msopenh264 - needs OpenH264 sources which are not in Debian, since Debian ftpmasters are really strict to avoid unclear/problematic licenses I doubt we can get this into Debian any time soon, and I really don't have the power to push this forward - have linphone-desktop download the Cisco OpenH264 codec itself The last option would be the preferred one. When I enable the slider in the GUI it asks me to download the codec. The progress bar appears, a success message appears, but the slider stays disabled. The download is successful, there is a x86-64 library in ~/.local/share/linphone/codecs named libopenh264.so. Even in strace I can just see that it opens the file, mmap() on the fd and closes it again. Later there is a info message 'Loading "libopenh264.so' symbols...", but that's it. Since I'm not using video calls I'm not going to invest too much time. But maybe there is an easy solution for this. Can anyone shed some light on it how to debug this further? Bernhard _______________________________________________ Linphone-developers mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers |
Bernhard Schmidt <[hidden email]> writes: From looking at the OpenH264 site, I have to agree that ftpmasters made the right call. > - have linphone-desktop download the Cisco OpenH264 codec itself I'm not 100% sure I understand, but: Is that really an ok thing to do, for a program in main? That seems like downloading non-Free code on the fly, which not only raises DFSG issues, but also 1) how the download is checked (signature/hash)? and 2) portability issues. > The last option would be the preferred one. When I enable the slider in > the GUI it asks me to download the codec. The progress bar appears, a > success message appears, but the slider stays disabled. It seems like if the plan is to use that, then the cisco openh264 code should be in non-free as a packaged binary, and linphone depending on it, and demoted to contrib from main. Alternatively, some plugin arch for libphone, so that linphone proper is Free and there is a non-free plugin that depeonds on linphone, not the other way around. There is also the issue of distributing a derived work under GPLv3 for which one needs a patent license. I have grown fuzzy on the details, but my memory is that one simply can't distirbute such a work in any country where the patent applies. IANAL, TINLA! _______________________________________________ Linphone-developers mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers |
Am 27.12.20 um 01:21 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Hi Greg, >> - have linphone-desktop download the Cisco OpenH264 codec itself > > I'm not 100% sure I understand, but: > > Is that really an ok thing to do, for a program in main? That seems > like downloading non-Free code on the fly, which not only raises DFSG > issues, but also 1) how the download is checked (signature/hash)? and 2) > portability issues. I agree it makes me somewhat squirmy. I would prefer something that could be shipped with Debian, which I think can only be msx264. @belledonne: Is msx264 something that could be polished/still used or is this absoletely deprecated? I guess the compiler warnings could be fixed (one of them has been fixed in git as far as I can see), and if this is just minor glue between mediastreamer2 and x264 it probably does not need a lot of updates. > >> The last option would be the preferred one. When I enable the slider in >> the GUI it asks me to download the codec. The progress bar appears, a >> success message appears, but the slider stays disabled. > > It seems like if the plan is to use that, then the cisco openh264 code > should be in non-free as a packaged binary, and linphone depending on > it, and demoted to contrib from main. > > Alternatively, some plugin arch for libphone, so that linphone proper is > Free and there is a non-free plugin that depeonds on linphone, not the > other way around. > > There is also the issue of distributing a derived work under GPLv3 for which one > needs a patent license. I have grown fuzzy on the details, but my > memory is that one simply can't distirbute such a work in any country > where the patent applies. > > IANAL, TINLA! Me neither :-) But yes, thinking about it again I think the best option would be to disable this downloading thing. If I understand linphone-app/src/components/codecs/VideoCodecsModel.cpp correctly it is downloading from a http-location without any verification. Hoping for msx264... Bernhard _______________________________________________ Linphone-developers mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers |
Bernhard Schmidt <[hidden email]> writes: > But yes, thinking about it again I think the best option would be to > disable this downloading thing. If I understand > linphone-app/src/components/codecs/VideoCodecsModel.cpp correctly it is > downloading from a http-location without any verification. > > Hoping for msx264... I am not the least bit sure I understand, but it seems the biggest problem is that the H.264 codec has serious patent issues, and there is some notion that if you run the binary from Cisco you are covered by their license. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Video_Coding So it may be that H.264 is fundamentally incompataible with Free Software. Having source, and a binary, and being able to distribute the source, and distribute and use the binary, but not being able to use a binary compiled from the source is a fail. That's why I suggested the notion of a package of cisco's binary in non-free and a plugin for linphone, so as not to break the free-software-ness of the basic linphone package. Or really to unbreak it, because downloading binaries at runtime is troubling. It's great that linphone has VP8, as that appears to be Free compatible. _______________________________________________ Linphone-developers mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers |
Am 29.12.20 um 15:56 schrieb Greg Troxel:
Hi, >> But yes, thinking about it again I think the best option would be to >> disable this downloading thing. If I understand >> linphone-app/src/components/codecs/VideoCodecsModel.cpp correctly it is >> downloading from a http-location without any verification. >> >> Hoping for msx264... > > I am not the least bit sure I understand, but it seems the biggest > problem is that the H.264 codec has serious patent issues, and there is > some notion that if you run the binary from Cisco you are covered by > their license. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Video_Coding > > So it may be that H.264 is fundamentally incompataible with Free > Software. Having source, and a binary, and being able to distribute the > source, and distribute and use the binary, but not being able to use a > binary compiled from the source is a fail. Indeed, but somehow x264 seems to work around both source code license (probably being a clean-room implementation) and the royalities. It has been in Debian main for years. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/x264 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X264 So getting msx264 into a usable shape would be the easiest way for Debian. > It's great that linphone has VP8, as that appears to be Free compatible. True, but most hardphones don't support it. Our yealink desktop phones actually do (not tested yet), but the 2N door station only supports H264. Bernhard _______________________________________________ Linphone-developers mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |